小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测--具有超强持久力和超大屏幕的经济型平板电脑Apple iPad Air 的廉价替代品。 在许多方面，小米 Pad 7 Pro 都优于 iPad Air 2024，但价格却不到后者的一半。尤其是小米平板电脑的 3K 显示屏，在这个价位上是无与伦比的。不过，与小米 Pad 7 相比，Pro 版可能有一个缺陷。Marcus Herbrich, 👁 Daniel Schmidt (translated by DeepL / Ninh Duy) Published 02/12/2025 🇺🇸 🇩🇪 ...
🇷🇺 🇫🇷 🇪🇸 🇵🇹 🇮🇹 🇳🇱 🇸🇪 🇹🇷 🇵🇱 🇭🇺 Android Touchscreen Tablet
小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测在我们的评测中，小米 Pad 7 Pro 的性能、功能和价格比给我们留下了非常深刻的印象。它配备了功能强大的高通处理器、无 PWM 高分辨率显示屏和出色的扬声器系统，可确保用户享受到绝佳的音质。因此，它是一款非常适合多媒体应用的中端平板电脑。由于电池续航能力极强，加上支持手写笔和可选配的键盘保护套，没有什么能阻挡你高效完成工作。
Test device courtesy of TradingShenzhen
Download your licensed rating image as PNG / SVG
不过，小米平板电脑也留下了一些问号，尤其是在更新政策和全球可用性方面。因此，希望获得长期软件支持的用户应该选择Galaxy Tab S9 或三星Galaxy Tab S9 FE。此外，由于缺乏 GNSS 和 5G 选项以及 6 GHz Wi-Fi，Pad 7 Pro 在连接性方面受到一定限制。
Pros+ 明亮的 144 Hz 面板
+ 高档外观
+ 电池寿命长
+ 高性能
+ 强大的扬声器Cons- (目前）只能导入
- 无 6 GHz 频段
- 无更新保证
价格和供应情况小米 Pad 7 Pro 目前仅在德国以进口方式销售。在中国，这款中档平板电脑的基本版售价为 2499 元（约合 330 美元）。在我们的合作伙伴深圳贸易公司，起价约为 440 美元。目前还没有进一步的全球上市迹象，因此 Pro 版（与 Pad 6 系列类似）可能不会进入欧洲市场。
可能的替代品比较
ImageModel / ReviewPriceWeightDriveDisplay
1.86.5%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 735 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $609.99Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Ai WiFi Ver...2. $402.00Xiaomi Pad 7 Ai WiFi Version...3. $296.00Xiaomi Redmi Pad Pro WiFi Ve...List Price: 450€500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.20"3200x2136344 PPIIPS
2.86.1%OnePlus Pad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 750 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: $549.00List Price: 549€584 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash12.10"3000x2120304 PPIIPS
3.90% v7 (old)Apple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2 ⎘ Apple M2 10-Core GPU ⎘8 GB Memory, 128 GB NVMeAmazon: $729.89List Price: 699€462 g128 GB NVMe10.86"2360x1640265 PPIIPS
4.81.1%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W ⎘ HiSilicon Maleoon 910 ⎘8 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: 1. $5.47Mr.Shield Screen Protector c...2. $10.96Kepuch Custer Case Compatibl...3. $41.99YOUULAR Tablet Case for Huaw...List Price: 399€510 g256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash11.50"2800x1840291 PPITFT-LCD
5.90.9% v7 (old)Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy ⎘ Qualcomm Adreno 740 ⎘12 GB Memory, 256 GB Amazon: List Price: 1169€500 g256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash11.00"2560x1600274 PPIDynamic AMOLED 2x
Table of Contents小米 Pad 7 Pro 评测小米 Pad 7 Pro 规格外壳 - 小米平板电脑采用金属外壳功能 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 USB 3.2 接口。软件 - 小米平板电脑运行Android 15通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 缺乏 GPS 的平板电脑摄像头 - 小米平板电脑只有一个摄像头配件和保修 - Pad 7 Pro 随附一个电源适配器输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑和 360 Hz显示屏 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 LCD性能 - 小米平板电脑依赖于高通公司排放量电池运行时间 - 小米平板电脑充电迅速Notebookcheck 总体评分
4 Reviews ← exclude selected types
与 小米 15和 小米 15 Pro作为其中国发布会的一部分，中国制造商还展示了小米 Pad 7 Pro。这款中端平板电脑配置了 11.2 英寸显示屏和骁龙 8s Gen 3 处理器。 骁龙 8s Gen 3.由于价格低廉，制造商在可选配件方面也毫不妥协。带照明按键的键盘盖和触控笔也可将 Pad 7 Pro 变为学校或大学的工作机器。
小米 Pad 7 Pro 规格
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Pad 7 Series)ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 8 x 2 - 2.8 GHz, Cortex-X4 / A720 / A720 / A520 (Kryo)Graphics adapterQualcomm Adreno 735Memory12 GB Display11.20 inch 3:2, 3200 x 2136 pixel 344 PPI, Capacitive Touchscreen, native pen support, IPS, glossy: yes, HDR, 144 HzStorage256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash, 256 GB , 225 GB freeConnections1 USB 3.0 / 3.1 Gen1, USB-C Power Delivery (PD), 1 HDMI, 1 DisplayPort, Audio Connections: USB Type C, 1 Fingerprint Reader, Brightness Sensor, Sensors: accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, OTG, MiracastNetworkingWi-Fi 7 (a/b/g/n = Wi-Fi 4/ac = Wi-Fi 5/ax = Wi-Fi 6/ Wi-Fi 6E 6 GHz be = Wi-Fi 7), Bluetooth 5.4Sizeheight x width x depth (in mm): 6.18 x 251.22 x 173.42Battery8850 mAh Lithium-IonChargingfast charging / QuickchargeOperating SystemAndroid 15CameraPrimary Camera: 50 MPix (f/1.8, 1/2.76", 4K@60fps) + 2 MPix (f/2.4), camera2 API: FullSecondary Camera: 32 MPix (f/2.2, FF)Additional featuresSpeakers: 4 Speaker, charger, USB cable, info material, HyperOS 2.0, 12 Months Warranty, widvine L1, BT-Codecs: SBC, AAC, LDAC, LHDC, aptX, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX TWS+, HDR10, HDR10+, Dolby Vision, HLG, fanlessWeight500 g, Power Supply: 93 g
Price450 EuroNote: The manufacturer may use components from different suppliers including display panels, drives or memory sticks with similar specifications.see all specifications
外壳 - 小米平板电脑采用金属外壳Pad 7 Pro 的装配和做工都非常出色，铝制边框和后部也具有高品质的手感。得益于磨砂表面，指纹不是问题，但制造商没有说明正面使用了哪种保护玻璃。
小米平板电脑的重量为 500 克，机身厚度不到 6 毫米，即使长时间使用也能轻松驾驭。尽管拥有 11 英寸的机身，Pad 7 Pro 的尺寸却相当紧凑。这也得益于其约 86% 的良好屏占比。这使得屏幕边框相当纤薄。该保护套没有 IP 认证。
小米 Pad 7 Pro 颜色（图片来源：小米）
» Notebookcheck多媒体笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck游戏笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck低价办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck高端办公/商务笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck工作站笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck亚笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck超级本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck变形本产品Top 10排名» Notebookcheck平板电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck智能手机Top 10排名» Notebookcheck评测过最出色的笔记本电脑屏幕» Notebookcheck售价500欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名» Notebookcheck售价300欧元以下笔记本电脑Top 10排名
尺寸比较
OnePlus Pad 2 Huawei MatePad 11.5 S Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Apple iPad Air 11 2024 DIN A5 ❌
功能 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 USB 3.2 接口。小米平板电脑配备 8 或 12 GB LDDR5X 内存和 256 或 512 GB UFS 4.0 存储空间。此外，Pad 7 Pro 的四扬声器系统、手写笔支持、Miracast 和指纹传感器为中端平板电脑提供了强大的功能。在测试中，我们还通过快速 USB 3.2 端口（1 代）测得三星 980 Pro（M2 固态硬盘）的数据传输速度高达 212 MB/s。连接的存储介质可使用 NTFS 或 exFAT 格式化。借助适配器，USB 端口还可将图像信号输出到外部屏幕。
软件 - 小米平板电脑运行Android 15Pad 7 Pro 使用的是该公司自己的第二代 HyperOS，其中包括 Play Protect 认证。我们的中文版开箱并不支持谷歌服务，但出厂时已经预装了谷歌框架。这意味着可以通过该公司自己的应用商店手动安装 PlayStore。不过，除中文和英文外，无法选择德语语言包。
小米公司不愿提供有关中国市场软件更新的信息。在我们进行评测时，小米平板电脑的Android 15 包含从 2024 年 12 月开始的安全补丁。我们认为产品支持期不会超过两到三年。
可持续性小米没有提供有关所用材料及其回收率的详细信息，但制造商提供了一般的回收信息。重点是增加回收材料的使用，包括铝、金和铜。使用有机基高分子材料和从废弃渔网中回收的塑料也有助于将生态足迹降至最低。
包装看似不含塑料，但设备本身是用铝箔包裹的。包装的其余部分由纸板制成。
通信和全球导航卫星系统 - 缺乏 GPS 的平板电脑小米平板电脑既不提供使用移动数据的选项，也不支持通过卫星系统定位。
在家庭网络中，Pad 7 Pro 使用现代 WiFi 7 标准，但只能在 2.4 和 5 GHz 范围内建立连接。在与华硕 ROG Rapture GT-AXE11000 配对的测试中，我们在不使用 6 GHz 频段的情况下实现了近 1,000 Mbit/s 的惊人传输速度。不过，我们无法使用 6E 参考路由器完全利用 WiFi 7。
Networking
iperf3 transmit AXE11000Huawei MatePad 11.5 S802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1015 (495min - 1037max) MBit/s +2%Average Wi-Fi 7 (556 - 1806, n=59)
1015 MBit/s +2%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProWi-Fi 7
991 (512min - 1016max) MBit/s Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GWi-Fi 6E
944 (474min - 970max) MBit/s -5%Average of class Tablet (10.5 - 1693, n=93, last 2 years)
559 MBit/s -44% iperf3 receive AXE11000Average Wi-Fi 7 (565 - 1875, n=59)
1014 MBit/s +13%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GWi-Fi 6E
951 (929min - 960max) MBit/s +6%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProWi-Fi 7
895 (751min - 988max) MBit/s Huawei MatePad 11.5 S802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
876 (737min - 950max) MBit/s -2%Average of class Tablet (20.1 - 1723, n=93, last 2 years)
583 MBit/s -35% iperf3 transmit AXE11000 6GHzAverage Wi-Fi 7 (563 - 1945, n=46)
1527 MBit/s Average of class Tablet (578 - 1898, n=21, last 2 years)
1257 MBit/s OnePlus Pad 2Wi-Fi 7
895 (675min - 1017max) MBit/s Apple iPad Air 11 2024802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
666 (403min - 883max) MBit/s iperf3 receive AXE11000 6GHzOnePlus Pad 2Wi-Fi 7
1652 (1472min - 1703max) MBit/s Average Wi-Fi 7 (451 - 1864, n=46)
1515 MBit/s Average of class Tablet (746 - 1842, n=21, last 2 years)
1401 MBit/s Apple iPad Air 11 2024802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/ax
1196 (767min - 1336max) MBit/s
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø974 (512-1016) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 transmit AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø929 (474-970) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Wi-Fi 7; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø891 (751-988) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Wi-Fi 6E; iperf3 receive AXE11000; iperf 3.1.3: Ø951 (929-960)
摄像头 - 小米平板电脑只有一个摄像头与小米 Pad 7 Pro 自拍合影在 Pad 7 Pro 的相机系统方面，小米从其姊妹机型 Pad 6S Pro 中汲取了灵感。前置 3200 万像素镜头采用了像素二进制技术，但只能使用固定焦距。对于这个价位的产品来说，照片质量还是可以接受的。使用前置摄像头可以 30fps 的全高清画质录制视频。此外，这款中端平板电脑还能拍摄 4K60 的动态图像。
相机系统的核心是一个自动对焦的 5000 万像素镜头，光圈为 f/1.8。在日光下，三星 JN1 能拍出不错的照片，对于一款售价不到 500 美元的平板电脑来说，照片质量非常出色。不过，色彩还原有时似乎有点过度饱和。Pad 7 Pro 所提供的照片质量非常适合为文件拍照，以便日后添加注释。通过相应的模式，识别到的文档区域也会自动裁剪并保存。
1x2x5x10倍（最大值）文件模式
Image comparison
Choose a scene and navigate within the first image. One click changes the position on touchscreens. One click on the zoomed-in image opens the original in a new window. The first image shows the scaled photograph of the test device.
Wide-angleWide-angleLow-lightZoom 5xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1xclick to load imagesXiaomi Pad 7 ProApple iPhone 16 Pro MaxHonor Magic7 ProCanon EOS 90D0.2x2 MPixel4 Mpixel1x
4.2 ∆E4.2 ∆E6.4 ∆E7.1 ∆E6.8 ∆E3.6 ∆E3.1 ∆E8 ∆E6.8 ∆E3.1 ∆E5.9 ∆E2 ∆E8.3 ∆E10.5 ∆E10.2 ∆E2.2 ∆E8 ∆E11.7 ∆E7.3 ∆E3.9 ∆E7.3 ∆E6.1 ∆E2.5 ∆E4.8 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 6 ∆E min: 1.96 - max: 11.66 ∆E29.6 ∆E54.6 ∆E39.3 ∆E34.8 ∆E45.2 ∆E61.9 ∆E53.3 ∆E35.7 ∆E43.2 ∆E29 ∆E64.7 ∆E63.7 ∆E31.5 ∆E47.2 ∆E36.9 ∆E76.1 ∆E44.1 ∆E41.5 ∆E92 ∆E70.6 ∆E52 ∆E36.4 ∆E23.8 ∆E13.3 ∆EColorChecker Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro: 46.69 ∆E min: 13.35 - max: 92 ∆E
Xiaomi Pad 7 ProXiaomi Pad 7 Pro
配件和保修 - Pad 7 Pro 随附一个电源适配器小米 Pad 7 Pro 的电源适配器（图片来源：Marcus Herbrich）包装盒内包括一个 67 瓦快速充电电源适配器、一条数据线或充电线（USB-A 转 USB-C）和一份快速指南。深圳贸易公司在中国版的基础上增加了充电器的欧盟适配器和 USB OTG 适配器。Pad 7 Pro 还可选配触控笔和键盘盖。
我们的进口设备提供 12 个月 保修.如果需要保修，Trading Shenzhen 可以选择将智能手机寄往德国的收货地址。
输入设备和操作 - 小米平板电脑和 360 Hz该设备可以用手指和 15 克重的小米 Focus Pen（具有 8192 级压力灵敏度）进行操作。得益于高达 144 Hz 的高刷新率，尽管分辨率为 3K，但显示效果非常流畅。不过，我们的评测设备还是出现了一些微小的抖动。
指纹传感器位于平板电脑左侧的开/关按钮内。用食指很容易就能触及传感器区域。解锁过程快速可靠，还可以通过前置摄像头进行二维面部识别。
显示屏 - Pad 7 Pro 采用 LCDLC 显示器采用经典的 RGB 子像素矩阵，由一个红光、一个蓝光和一个绿光二极管组成。IPS 面板的宽高比为 3:2，像素密度高达 345 PPI，对于平板电脑来说亮度非常吸引人。在使用白色背景进行测量时，我们也达到了制造商规定的 800 尼特亮度。APL18 测试中的峰值亮度为 780 cd/m²，而观看 HDR 视频时达到的最大亮度仅为 522 cd/m²。此外，还获得了德国莱茵 TÜV 的三重认证（无闪烁、低蓝光含量、"昼夜节律友好"）。
得益于 LC 技术，即使在低亮度条件下，我们也无法检测到任何闪烁，这对 PMW 敏感的用户来说应该很有吸引力。
749cd/m²799cd/m²756cd/m²739cd/m²776cd/m²725cd/m²742cd/m²724cd/m²744cd/m²
Distribution of brightnesstested with X-Rite i1Pro 3Maximum: 799 cd/m² (Nits) Average: 750.4 cd/m² Minimum: 1.48 cd/m²Brightness Distribution: 91 %Center on Battery: 776 cd/m²Contrast: 1338:1 (Black: 0.58 cd/m²)ΔE ColorChecker Calman: 1.6 | ∀{0.5-29.43 Ø4.83}ΔE Greyscale Calman: 2.5 | ∀{0.09-98 Ø5.1}99.3% sRGB (Calman 2D)Gamma: 2.23CCT: 6892 K
Xiaomi Pad 7 ProIPS, 3200x2136, 11.2"OnePlus Pad 2IPS, 3000x2120, 12.1"Apple iPad Air 11 2024IPS, 2360x1640, 10.9"Huawei MatePad 11.5 STFT-LCD, 2800x1840, 11.5"Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GDynamic AMOLED 2x, 2560x1600, 11"Screen5%-1%-66%-15%Brightness middle776833 7%506 -35%511 -34%576 -26%Brightness750771 3%474 -37%449 -40%579 -23%Brightness Distribution9184 -8%87 -4%83 -9%99 9%Black Level *0.580.45 22%0.4 31%0.99 -71%Contrast13381851 38%1265 -5%516 -61%Colorchecker dE 2000 *1.61.79 -12%1.48 7%3.6 -125%2.5 -56%Colorchecker dE 2000 max. *4.54.01 11%3.12 31%7.5 -67%4.6 -2%Greyscale dE 2000 *2.53 -20%2.3 8%5.5 -120%2.3 8%Gamma2.23 99%2.254 98%2.204 100%2.27 97%2.02 109%CCT6892 94%6419 101%6954 93%7566 86%6585 99%* ... smaller is better
Screen Flickering / PWM (Pulse-Width Modulation)ℹTo dim the screen, some notebooks will simply cycle the backlight on and off in rapid succession - a method called Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) . This cycling frequency should ideally be undetectable to the human eye. If said frequency is too low, users with sensitive eyes may experience strain or headaches or even notice the flickering altogether.Screen flickering / PWM not detectedIn comparison: 53 % of all tested devices do not use PWM to dim the display. If PWM was detected, an average of 8327 (minimum: 5 - maximum: 343500) Hz was measured.
对比度保持在 1,500:1 左右的合理水平，"专业 "配置文件对色彩的校准也非常出色。个别颜色的差异几乎看不出来。色彩表现的设置选项也很丰富。除了各种色彩配置文件外，还可以调整色温和色彩空间。
色彩准确度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Farbraum（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
灰度（配置文件：专业、暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
色彩饱和度（配置文件：专业，暖色，目标色彩空间：sRGB）
Display Response TimesℹDisplay response times show how fast the screen is able to change from one color to the next. Slow response times can lead to afterimages and can cause moving objects to appear blurry (ghosting). Gamers of fast-paced 3D titles should pay special attention to fast response times. ↔ Response Time Black to White18.37 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 4.82 ms rise↘ 13.55 ms fallThe screen shows good response rates in our tests, but may be too slow for competitive gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.1 (minimum) to 240 (maximum) ms. » 39 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is better than the average of all tested devices (20.5 ms). ↔ Response Time 50% Grey to 80% Grey36.13 ms ... rise ↗ and fall ↘ combined↗ 11.32 ms rise↘ 24.81 ms fallThe screen shows slow response rates in our tests and will be unsatisfactory for gamers.In comparison, all tested devices range from 0.165 (minimum) to 636 (maximum) ms. » 50 % of all devices are better.This means that the measured response time is worse than the average of all tested devices (32.1 ms).
由于亮度相对较高，这款中档平板电脑在户外使用非常方便。不过，在阴凉处，Pad 7 Pro 的显示屏即使在夏天也不会受到任何限制。IPS 面板的可视角度非常吸引人。
性能 - 小米平板电脑依赖于高通公司在我们的一系列基准测试中 骁龙 8s 第 3 代与 12GB 内存一起运行，达到了中端平板电脑的高性能水平。与 Galaxy 平板电脑 S9相比，记录的分数要低一些。在图形测试中 Adreno 735也取得了不错的成绩；不过，在要求苛刻的 GFXBench tier 测试中，它的工作就像拉上了手刹。
Geekbench 6.4 | Geekbench 5.5 | PCMark for Android | CrossMark | BaseMark OS II | UL Procyon AI Inference for Android | AImark | Geekbench AI | AI Benchmark Geekbench 6.4
Single-CoreApple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
2587 Points +31%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
2079 Points +5%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1973 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1821 - 2012, n=7)
1924 Points -2%Average of class Tablet (185 - 3715, n=96, last 2 years)
1281 Points -35%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1245 Points -37%OnePlus Pad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
954 Points -52% Multi-CoreApple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
10085 Points +97%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5503 Points +7%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
5127 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4602 - 5284, n=7)
4938 Points -4%OnePlus Pad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
4564 Points -11%Average of class Tablet (493 - 14690, n=96, last 2 years)
4083 Points -20%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3989 Points -22%Geekbench 5.5
Single-CoreApple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1887 Points +34%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1550 Points +10%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1329 - 1498, n=7)
1431 Points +2%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1403 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
965 Points -31%Average of class Tablet (103 - 2286, n=78, last 2 years)
858 Points -39% Multi-CoreApple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
8624 Points +87%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
5036 Points +9%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
4602 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3980 - 4746, n=7)
4359 Points -5%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
3694 Points -20%Average of class Tablet (303 - 10522, n=78, last 2 years)
3208 Points -30%PCMark for Android - Work 3.0
Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (15547 - 19083, n=7)
16859 Points +7%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16172 Points +3%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
15743 Points OnePlus Pad 2Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, Adreno 750, 12288
12156 Points -23%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
11872 Points -25%Average of class Tablet (3195 - 25683, n=84, last 2 years)
11155 Points -29%CrossMark - Overall
Apple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
1437 Points +28%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1222 Points +9%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1123 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (771 - 1155, n=7)
984 Points -12%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
911 Points -19%Average of class Tablet (172 - 2155, n=67, last 2 years)
857 Points -24%BaseMark OS II
OverallXiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
8895 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8673 Points -2%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5685 - 9147, n=7)
7903 Points -11%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
6401 Points -28%Average of class Tablet (195 - 12211, n=67, last 2 years)
5075 Points -43%Apple iPad Air 11 2024Apple M2, M2 10-Core GPU, 8192
Points -100% SystemSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
14097 Points +42%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (9875 - 13391, n=7)
11865 Points +19%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10447 Points +5%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
9937 Points Average of class Tablet (904 - 16435, n=67, last 2 years)
8179 Points -18% MemoryXiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
12938 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
8702 Points -33%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (5456 - 12938, n=7)
8566 Points -34%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
8362 Points -35%Average of class Tablet (401 - 17036, n=67, last 2 years)
5878 Points -55% GraphicsSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
31626 Points +28%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
24738 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (8020 - 29006, n=7)
23198 Points -6%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
12763 Points -48%Average of class Tablet (418 - 57192, n=67, last 2 years)
12644 Points -49% WebXiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1928 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (1534 - 1928, n=7)
1770 Points -8%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
1532 Points -21%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1460 Points -24%Average of class Tablet (10 - 2273, n=67, last 2 years)
1395 Points -28%UL Procyon AI Inference for Android - Overall Score NNAPI
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
16088 Points +9%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
14738 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (13576 - 15572, n=6)
14570 Points -1%Average of class Tablet (2597 - 74821, n=66, last 2 years)
12985 Points -12%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
10847 Points -26%AImark - Score v3.x
Average of class Tablet (138 - 156427, n=59, last 2 years)
7310 Points +513%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GQualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, Adreno 740, 12288
1308 Points +10%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1192 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (946 - 1321, n=7)
1165 Points -2%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
738 Points -38%Geekbench AI
Quantized TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (130 - 4532, n=15, last 2 years)
1159 Points +7%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
1082 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (n=1)
1082 Points 0% Half Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Average of class Tablet (84 - 4545, n=15, last 2 years)
854 Points +83%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
466 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (n=1)
466 Points 0% Single Precision TensorFlow NNAPI 1.2Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
473 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (n=1)
473 Points 0%Average of class Tablet (85 - 1140, n=15, last 2 years)
417 Points -12%AI Benchmark
Score V5Average of class Tablet (66.1 - 8305, n=8, last 2 years)
1709 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (115 - 194, n=3)
143 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SHiSilicon Kirin 9000W, Maleoon 910, 8192
101 Points Score V6Xiaomi Pad 7 ProQualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, Adreno 735, 12288
3686 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (n=1)
3686 Points 0%Average of class Tablet (70.4 - 12784, n=15, last 2 years)
3056 Points -17%
3DMark: Wild Life Extreme Unlimited | Wild Life Extreme | Wild Life Unlimited Score | Solar Bay Score | Solar Bay Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score | Steel Nomad Light Score GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7: T-Rex Onscreen | 1920x1080 T-Rex Offscreen GFXBench 3.0: on screen Manhattan Onscreen OGL | 1920x1080 1080p Manhattan Offscreen GFXBench 3.1: on screen Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen | 1920x1080 Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen GFXBench: on screen Car Chase Onscreen | 1920x1080 Car Chase Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen | 2560x1440 Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen | on screen Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen | 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen | 3840x2160 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen 3DMark / Wild Life Extreme Unlimited
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6204 Points +89%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4454 Points +36%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3826 Points +17%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3283 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1018 Points -69%3DMark / Wild Life Extreme
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
5598 Points +75%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
4485 Points +40%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3857 Points +20%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
3201 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
994 Points -69%3DMark / Wild Life Unlimited Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
23565 Points +95%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
14527 Points +20%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
12074 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
3802 Points -69%3DMark / Solar Bay Score
OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8315 Points +60%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
6654 Points +28%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5627 Points +8%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5212 Points 3DMark / Solar Bay Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
8321 Points +61%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
7899 Points +52%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5550 Points +7%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
5182 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Unlimited Score
OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1626 Points +51%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1075 Points 3DMark / Steel Nomad Light Score
OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
1639 Points +49%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
1098 Points Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
Points -100%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps 0%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -50%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
60 fps -50%GFXBench (DX / GLBenchmark) 2.7 / T-Rex Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
628 fps +40%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
449 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
367 fps -18%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
256 fps -43%GFXBench 3.0 / Manhattan Onscreen OGL
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps -45%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
56 fps -49%GFXBench 3.0 / 1080p Manhattan Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
411 fps +54%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
267 fps Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
249 fps -7%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
155 fps -42%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97 fps +67%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +3%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
58 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
40 fps -31%GFXBench 3.1 / Manhattan ES 3.1 Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
281 fps +54%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
186 fps +2%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
183 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
106 fps -42%GFXBench / Car Chase Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
64 fps +83%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +71%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
35 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
22 fps -37%GFXBench / Car Chase Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
173 fps +59%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
120 fps +10%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
109 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
48 fps -56%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
62 fps +107%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +100%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
42 fps +40%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
30 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
16 fps -47%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
69 fps +30%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
69 fps +30%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
68 fps +28%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
53 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
23 fps -57%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Onscreen
Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95 fps +107%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
60 fps +30%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
50 fps +9%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
46 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
28 fps -39%GFXBench / Aztec Ruins Normal Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
208 fps +43%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
170 fps +17%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
168 fps +16%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
145 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
64 fps -56%GFXBench / 4K Aztec Ruins High Tier Offscreen
Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
36.7 fps +53%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
32 fps +33%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
32 fps +33%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
24 fps Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
10 fps -58%
Jetstream 2 | Speedometer 3.0 | WebXPRT 4 | Octane V2 | Mozilla Kraken 1.1 Jetstream 2 - 2.0 Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
256.985 Points +32%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
195.343 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (59.7 - 235, n=7)
160.1 Points -18%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
152.9 Points -22%Average of class Tablet (19.9 - 393, n=74, last 2 years)
131.3 Points -33%Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
89.474 Points -54%Speedometer 3.0 - Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
29.9 runs/min +143%Average of class Tablet (1.25 - 34.4, n=48, last 2 years)
13.8 runs/min +12%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
12.3 runs/min Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (3.54 - 13.6, n=7)
10.1 runs/min -18%Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
3.11 runs/min -75%WebXPRT 4 - Overall
Apple iPad Air 11 2024
243 Points +57%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
179 Points +15%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
155 Points Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (61 - 185, n=7)
146.3 Points -6%Average of class Tablet (21 - 315, n=75, last 2 years)
121.5 Points -22%Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
85 Points -45%Octane V2 - Total Score
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
77756 Points +18%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
65712 Points Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (Edge 117)
49582 Points -25%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (28536 - 66369, n=7)
48215 Points -27%OnePlus Pad 2 (Chrome 128)
45083 Points -31%Average of class Tablet (763 - 111219, n=101, last 2 years)
36364 Points -45%Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
32134 Points -51%Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Total
Average of class Tablet (319 - 34733, n=84, last 2 years)
3193 ms * -388%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G (chrome 117)
1532.5 ms * -134%Huawei MatePad 11.5 S (Huawei Browser V14)
1243.7 ms * -90%Average Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (603 - 1456, n=7)
874 ms * -34%Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Chrome 132)
654.56 ms * Apple iPad Air 11 2024 (Safari 17)
442.8 ms * +32%* ... smaller is better
Xiaomi Pad 7 ProOnePlus Pad 2Huawei MatePad 11.5 SSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAverage 256 GB UFS 4.0 FlashAverage of class TabletAndroBench 3-5-29%-16%-13%7%-49% Sequential Read 256KB3849.522003.1 -48%1837.4 -52%3355.97 -13%3715 ?(3249 - 4384, n=40) -3%1425 ?(126.9 - 4089, n=86, last 2 years) -63% Sequential Write 256KB3283.911732.7 -47%1134.93 -65%2188.2 -33%2739 ?(555 - 3484, n=40) -17%1022 ?(80.4 - 3484, n=86, last 2 years) -69% Random Read 4KB302.34236.5 -22%334.71 11%451.18 49%383 ?(218 - 483, n=40) 27%217 ?(20.1 - 474, n=86, last 2 years) -28% Random Write 4KB346.85348.6 1%498.29 44%160.96 -54%412 ?(51.8 - 730, n=40) 19%230 ?(8.8 - 745, n=86, last 2 years) -34%
排放量温度机箱的温度其实并不高，但测得的表面温度却不均匀，Pad 7 Pro 在一个热点区域的温度超过了 42 度。我们使用 3DMark 来检查机箱内部的散热情况。Wild Life 压力测试以 90% 以上的高一致性结束。
Max. LoadIdle
33.9 °C42.2 °C42.6 °C 29.5 °C32.5 °C32.3 °C 31 °C31.1 °C32.3 °C
Maximum: 42.6 °CAverage: 34.2 °C
39.8 °C40.7 °C36.8 °C31.7 °C33 °C30.9 °C30.3 °C31.4 °C29.2 °C
Maximum: 40.7 °CAverage: 33.8 °C Power Supply (max.) 29.1 °C | Room Temperature 21.4 °C | Voltcraft IR-260Max. LoadIdle
27.7 °C28.7 °C28.1 °C 27.7 °C28.4 °C28.3 °C 29.2 °C30 °C29.7 °C
Maximum: 30 °CAverage: 28.6 °C
27.2 °C27.2 °C27.1 °C26.6 °C27.3 °C27 °C27 °C27.4 °C27.3 °C
Maximum: 27.4 °CAverage: 27.1 °C Power Supply (max.) 26 °C | Room Temperature 21.3 °C | Voltcraft IR-260(±) The average temperature for the upper side under maximal load is 34.2 °C / 94 F, compared to the average of 30 °C / 86 F for the devices in the class Tablet.(±) The maximum temperature on the upper side is 42.6 °C / 109 F, compared to the average of 33.7 °C / 93 F, ranging from 20.7 to 53.2 °C for the class Tablet.(±) The bottom heats up to a maximum of 40.7 °C / 105 F, compared to the average of 33.2 °C / 92 F(+) In idle usage, the average temperature for the upper side is 28.6 °C / 83 F, compared to the device average of 30 °C / 86 F.
3DMark Steel Nomad Stress Test
3DMark
Wild Life Stress Test StabilityApple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
100 % +13%Huawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99.2 % +12%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
88.7 % OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
77 % -13%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
71.6 % -19% Wild Life Extreme Stress TestHuawei MatePad 11.5 SMaleoon 910, Kirin 9000W, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
99 % +10%Xiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
89.8 % Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
84.9 % -5%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
83.8 % -7%Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
65.3 % -27% Solar Bay Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
95.7 % Apple iPad Air 11 2024M2 10-Core GPU, M2, 128 GB NVMe
87.3 % -9%OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.9 % -9%Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5GAdreno 740, SD 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
79.8 % -17% Steel Nomad Light Stress Test StabilityXiaomi Pad 7 ProAdreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash
97.1 % OnePlus Pad 2Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash
86.5 % -11%
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø18 (17.6-19.6) OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Extreme Stress Test; 1.1.4.1: Ø24.1 (22.9-27.4) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø65 (63.4-71.5) OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Wild Life Stress Test Stability; 0.0.0.0: Ø78.9 (74-96) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.11.1: Ø16.4 (16.2-16.9) OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Solar Bay Stress Test Stability; 1.0.6.5: Ø23.2 (22.2-25.5) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Adreno 735, SD 8s Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 4.0 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø7.81 (7.7-7.93) OnePlus Pad 2 Adreno 750, SD 8 Gen 3, 256 GB UFS 3.1 Flash; Steel Nomad Light Stress Test Stability; 1.1.1.3: Ø11.1 (10.6-12.3)
发言人Pad 7 Pro 有四个扬声器，并支持杜比全景声（Dolby Atmos）。就这个价位而言，音质非常不错，有很强的层次感和低音。粉红噪声的中音具有线性频率响应，而高音则稍有衰减。如果您希望实现外部声音输出，可以使用带线缆的 USB 端口，或通过蓝牙 5.4 无线连接。
Frequency diagram (checkboxes can be checked and unchecked to compare devices)Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro audio analysis(+) | speakers can play relatively loud (89.5 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(-) | nearly no bass - on average 17.7% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (7.4% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(+) | balanced mids - only 4.8% away from median(+) | mids are linear (4.4% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.1% away from median(+) | highs are linear (3.4% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (12.7% difference to median)Compared to same class» 19% of all tested devices in this class were better, 5% similar, 76% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 10% of all tested devices were better, 3% similar, 87% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
Apple iPad Air 11 2024 audio analysis(±) | speaker loudness is average but good (72.4 dB)Bass 100 - 315 Hz(±) | reduced bass - on average 8.6% lower than median(±) | linearity of bass is average (13% delta to prev. frequency)Mids 400 - 2000 Hz(±) | higher mids - on average 5% higher than median(±) | linearity of mids is average (9.6% delta to prev. frequency)Highs 2 - 16 kHz(+) | balanced highs - only 2.9% away from median(±) | linearity of highs is average (7.6% delta to prev. frequency)Overall 100 - 16.000 Hz(+) | overall sound is linear (14.3% difference to median)Compared to same class» 27% of all tested devices in this class were better, 4% similar, 69% worse» The best had a delta of 7%, average was 21%, worst was 129%Compared to all devices tested» 16% of all tested devices were better, 4% similar, 80% worse» The best had a delta of 4%, average was 24%, worst was 134%
电池运行时间 - 小米平板电脑充电迅速小米平板电脑拥有 8850 毫安时电池，可以高达 67 瓦的速度快速充电。使用附带的电源适配器，80 分钟后电池即可再次充满电。Pad 7 Pro 的耗电量相当高效，尤其是与 MatePad 11.5 S.
耗电量
Power Consumption
Off / Standby 0.06 / 0.16 WattIdle 0.75 / 1.5 / 1.56 Watt
Load
7.92 / 16.5 Watt
Key:
min: ,
med: ,
max: Metrahit Energy
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro8850 mAhApple iPad Air 11 2024 mAhHuawei MatePad 11.5 S8800 mAhSamsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G8400 mAhAverage Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Average of class Tablet Power Consumption-100%-124%-92%-28%-89%Idle Minimum *0.751.5 -100%1.53 -104%2.58 -244%1.267 ?(0.7 - 3.6, n=7) -69%1.857 ?(0.63 - 4.66, n=79, last 2 years) -148%Idle Average *1.53.6 -140%5.96 -297%3.24 -116%2.17 ?(1.09 - 6.52, n=7) -45%3.69 ?(1 - 9.2, n=79, last 2 years) -146%Idle Maximum *1.564.6 -195%6.07 -289%3.39 -117%2.3 ?(1.16 - 6.54, n=7) -47%4.01 ?(1.3 - 9.5, n=79, last 2 years) -157%Load Average *7.9212.8 -62%6.87 13%7.02 11%8.41 ?(6.5 - 10.6, n=7) -6%9.18 ?(2.5 - 34.9, n=76, last 2 years) -16%Load Maximum *16.516.8 -2%6.88 58%15.86 4%11.9 ?(8.64 - 16.5, n=7) 28%12.7 ?(4.6 - 41.6, n=76, last 2 years) 23%* ... smaller is better
Power consumption: Geekbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø6.02 (1.025-12.7) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Geekbench 5.5 Power Consumption 150cd: Ø8.87 (3.26-15.7) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)
Power consumption: GFXbench (150 cd/m²)
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø11.9 (11.3-12.5) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; 1920x1080 Aztec Ruins Normal Offscreen: Ø12.3 (9.05-14.4) Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø0.781 (0.697-1.46) Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 for Galaxy; Idle 150cd/m2: Ø3.31 (3.25-3.39)
电池寿命在我们使用 150 cd/m² 的适应显示亮度进行的日常 Wi-Fi 测试中，17.5 小时的运行时间对于一款 11 英寸平板电脑来说非常不错。
Battery Runtime
WiFi Websurfing (Chrome132)
17h 34min
Battery Runtime - WiFi v1.3
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro8850 mAh
1054 min OnePlus Pad 29510 mAh
866 min Apple iPad Air 11 2024 mAh
683 min Huawei MatePad 11.5 S8800 mAh
831 min Samsung Galaxy Tab S9 5G8400 mAh
539 min
Notebookcheck 总体评分购买小米 Pad 7 Pro 的理由有很多，但必须考虑到进口限制。
Back to the verdict
Xiaomi Pad 7 Pro
- 02/07/2025 v8
Marcus Herbrich
Chassis85 / 98 → 87%
Keyboard70 / 80 → 88%
Pointing Device92%
Connectivity59 / 69 → 86%
Weight83 / 40-88 → 90%
Battery91%
Display84%
Games Performance44 / 65 → 67%
Application Performance71 / 92 → 77%
AI Performance32%
Temperature91%
Noise100%
Audio84 / 91 → 93%
Camera60 / 90 → 66%
Average65%
87%
Tablet - Weighted Average
CO2 EmissionsNo DataMaterials40%Packaging50%Power Use97.3%Repairability40%Software Updates44.5% Total Sustainability Score: 45.3%
More articles related to this deviceXiaomi Pad 7 Pro (Pad 7 Series)Review•小米 Pad 7 评论：经济实惠的全能平板电脑，超越Apple iPad
TransparencyThe selection of devices to be reviewed is made by our editorial team. The test sample was provided to the author as a loan by the manufacturer or retailer for the purpose of this review. The lender had no influence on this review, nor did the manufacturer receive a copy of this review before publication. There was no obligation to publish this review. We never accept compensation or payment in return for our reviews. As an independent media company, Notebookcheck is not subjected to the authority of manufacturers, retailers or publishers.
This is how Notebookcheck is testing
Every year, Notebookcheck independently reviews hundreds of laptops and smartphones using standardized procedures to ensure that all results are comparable. We have continuously developed our test methods for around 20 years and set industry standards in the process. In our test labs, high-quality measuring equipment is utilized by experienced technicians and editors. These tests involve a multi-stage validation process. Our complex rating system is based on hundreds of well-founded measurements and benchmarks, which maintains objectivity. Further information on our test methods can be found here.
Editor of the original article: Andrew Dickson - Translator - 144 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2022Translator: Ninh Ngoc Duy - Editorial Assistant - 578570 articles published on Notebookcheck since 2008contact me via:
Please share our article, every link counts!